I recently came across a person who,
in the heat of the moment, began an exposition on the evils of lying
and cheating. He was extremely angry with a person whose blatant
dishonesty shocked and appalled him to the point of disbelief. He
simply couldn't understand how anyone could be so unkind and unfair.
The dishonest behavior, incidentally, directly affected the
well-being of this man and his family. As a result, his indignation
grew exponentially with each thought of its impact upon himself, his
wife and his innocent children. The poor man, I thought.

As a child grows, observes and learns,
he becomes initiated into the customs of his surroundings and learns
to appreciate more things, desire more things and as a result to wish
to hold on to even more things. The old saying about something being
as 'easy as taking candy from a baby' is, in my experience, bogus.
Few things are more difficult. The truth is, from the time we are
old enough to recognize a thing and desire to possess it, we become
indignant if someone takes it from us.

There is in everyone, I believe, not
only a desire for justice to be done to themselves, but also a
knowledge that other people also deserve the same justice. However,
this knowledge of the rights of others, sometimes gets lost in the
shuffle of our daily lives and grievances. We can get so caught up
in our own search for justice that we overlook the need to provide it
to others. This is overwhelmingly the cause of the most disputes
among my children. In the majority of cases, where one person has
been wronged, they, (the victim), were almost invariably guilty of
committing the same wrong against the perpetrator. Each in their
turn demanded justice, but neither was willing to dispense it to the
other. Each was willing to commit the offense and neither desired to
admit it or correct that behavior.
Such was the case with the man I
mentioned above. He was quick to point out the injustice of the
person who had been dishonest and had hurt his family. He easily
recognized the need, even the duty this person owed to him and his
family, to be honest and upright in his dealings with him. He,
however, in practically the same breath, began discussing with
impunity and without the least hesitation, his own dishonesty
in another matter. He justified himself in committing this
dishonest act by saying that he needed the advantages it would give
him. Amazed, I tried to point out that the same fault for which he
was willing to send one man to jail, was also a part of his own
character and didn't he think it strange to point an accusing finger
at one person when justice would certainly demand that the finger
also be pointed at him.
